Fr. Dale Matson
The
Word of God is both a mirror and a light. It reveals our inner nature to us,
both saint and sinner. What I was impressed with in writing a devotional was my
own lack of humility when in God’s presence and how often I fall short of His
call to live a pure and holy life.
I am
also impressed with how God has been turned into a charitable friend by our
modern churches. We do have a friend in Jesus but He is so much more than that.
He is also the transfigured and ascended Christ, Who is also God. He is also
the Christ who was a co-creator with the Father. In the 1979 BCP lectionary
readings, we see the compassionate human Christ but the righteous Christ Who
threw the money changers out of the temple is downplayed. Christ demands that
we follow Him, yoked to His pain, joy and holiness. We will all drink from His
cup of suffering until we put on immortality.
One
cannot walk away from the experience of writing a Lectio Divina format devotional
without being bathed in the light of Scripture. What has been missing for me is
the obvious Divine aspect of Christ, the moment-by-moment presence of God the
Holy Spirit and fear of the Father. I think the 1928 Book of Common Prayer gives
us a much fuller understanding of God than the 1979 BCP.
Much
of the 1928 prayer book is driven by a traditional catechism with questions
like this. “What is thy duty toward God?” “My duty toward God is to believe in
him and fear him…life.” The 1979
prayer book asks, “What is the nature of God revealed in Jesus?” “God is love”. He is a loving and gracious God
but to only portray Him in this way is a form of idolatry and paves the way for
a false Christology that deemphasizes God’s call to Holiness.
My
questions would be, “Who is God?” “Is God only love?” “Is he not also a
jealous, holy, sovereign and righteous God?” “Who is man?” “Is he
created in God’s image but also contaminated with original sin. “Do all humans
and all of corrupted creation need a savior?”
In the
1979 prayer book, human nature is misrepresented. “What does it mean to be
created in the image of God?” It means that we are free to make choices: to
love, to create, to reason, and to live in harmony with creation and God.” What
is described is human existence before
the fall. There is no mention of the fall, original sin and the corruption of
all creation. While the 1979 prayer book emphasizes free will and choices
(freedom), the 1928 prayer book describes in detail our duty (responsibilities) to neighbor including “…to do my duty in
that state of life unto which is shall please God to call me.”
When
a church manipulates belief through the selective use of lectionary Scripture,
then it is no different than Satan’s three temptations of Christ with the
selective use of Scripture. What Scripture is selected for the lectionary
lessons and how it is selected reflects the underlying theology of those who
select it. The Underground Pewster has had several examples posted on his blog
over the years, where Scripture readings are broken up to avoid certain passages.
(http://lowly.blogspot.com/2015/09/dilemma-mark-938-50-what-parts-to-ignore.html)
It
is TEC leadership that put “God in a box” by overemphasizing one aspect of His
being. In so doing, they also let man out of the box, so to speak. We are
called to “…do our duty.” We are free but we have constraints and boundaries,
duties and responsibilities. Good theology is God centered. Theology that is
man centered makes God in the image of an idealized man. When man is god, the
material earth becomes his kingdom and it is more important to save the earth that humans may "flourish" than to save souls for the Kingdom of God.
1 comment:
I remember when the 1979 Prayer Book came out. I was too young to fully understand the shift in theology contained therein, but I was old enough to know that modernizing the language (the justification used at the time) was not going to solve the church's problems. It hasn't, and one could argue that it has helped to accelerate the decline. To the average pewsitter, the 1979 new language was unnecessary and took some getting used to, but the theological shift was too subtle for us. The long term effects of subtle changes are what get you though.
The 1979 BCP was an attempt to put God in a new box. He won't stay there.
Post a Comment